Three paths for rebuilding 2KTA's site to match the relocation, framed Good / Better / Best:
A snapshot of the current site, for reference. The full audit and three rebuild paths follow below.
Before we send this proposal, we built three different visual directions for what 2KTA's new site could look like — using your real projects, your real address, and your existing portfolio. Three styles. You pick the one that feels right.
Click any concept above to interact with it. Use the tabs to switch between Modern Editorial, Dark Premium, and Warm Heritage.
I ran a fresh technical audit on 2kta.com before drafting this proposal. The site has a clear, honest portfolio of meaningful work — Jewel Condos, Christie House, Beth JL, the Halton Sport Centre — but the technical and SEO layers are not pulling their weight for a firm of your standing. The audit below explains why a rebuild (Options 2 or 3) is the recommendation rather than only polishing what's there.
Why Best is the right call:
Option 03 (Better) is a sensible compromise if:
Polish (Option 01) is the cheapest path. The honest tradeoffs:
Your 2kta.com domain stays exactly where it is — you don't lose ownership, change registrars, or do anything different. We build the new site separately, test it thoroughly, then flip a switch behind the scenes so visiting 2kta.com loads the new site instead of the old one. You and your contacts won't notice anything except that the site looks better and loads faster.
A 20-minute call is the easiest way to confirm scope and answer questions. Or, if email's easier, just reply with which option you'd like to move on and I'll send a contract.